The Secret DOS

The Little Emperor Strikes Back

What makes you come to work in the morning?

A trap is waiting to be sprung for me, I can tell. I am receiving emails from a member of staff who feels aggrieved at the centre’s recent recruitment of staff on very old contracts. They have all been offered permanent posts while this teacher, on a newer less ambiguous contract, remains employed under very precarious terms and conditions. The emails are all info-gathering and one gets the impression that once the trigger information has been supplied, then the trap will fall.

The plight of the middle manager – neither fish nor fowl, ni chicha ni limonada. I understand entirely where the teacher is coming from but feel slightly resentful at the subterfuge. I have always tried to play it closer to the staff – growling and grimacing when I felt that the role demanded it, but always trying to keep a sense of perspective. Surely it’s obvious that I am the Teachers’ Friend?

On a management course I was told of the telescope perspective: middle managers tend to look down the telescope through the correct lens. This has the effect of making things seem much nearer than they really are. Teachers, on the other hand, look down the telescope through the bigger lens, making the manager seem further away than they really are.

I get frustrated by the hierarchy side of things. We’re all there doing a job. Given our rate of pay, there is a reasonable expectation that we view it as a job worth doing well. But teachers would probably take less umbrage at the rate of pay and more at the lack of conditions that support them. They have very little time for self-development, very little time for course development, very little space in which to develop one thing or another – there is a self-serving expectation that development should come within the teachers’ own time.

Were I more than a lowly middle manager, I would have greater emphasis on the conditions that Daniel Pink refers to in this sterling video. If you haven’t seen it yet, believe me when I tell you that it is worth setting aside the requisite 11 minutes. Block them out now in your agenda and come back and watch the film. That way, the stats on this blog should double!

 

Advertisements

21 Feb 2012 - Posted by | Rants and ramblings

2 Comments »

  1. Brilliant. So I’ve not gone nutty as Owner, DOS, cleaning lady and teacher nanny. I was quite chuffed I’d found the same youtube clip also on TED, whilst trying to come up with a Guadiola style chat for the first day back post Roscon. Thanks

    The School Aranda de Duero

    Comment by castillainpictures | 15 Jan 2013 | Reply

    • You may well have gone nutty as well, you realise…

      Of course, Guardiola had the benefit of looking dan good in a suit and being able to begin any conversation with his team with the words, Right you lot. You’re getting paid millions per year so listen up… Daniel Pink’s theory is truly appealing, but there’s no getting away from the fact that he is assuming that material needs are being met as a baseline condition. In fact, not just being met but are being perceived to be met. How much of what truly motivates us is tied up in that simple little fact.

      Wouldn’t it be great to be so wealthy that you could say to your staff every year: how much do you think I should pay you?

      Comment by thesecretdos | 16 Jan 2013 | Reply


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: